Kazakhstan’s Path to Carbon Neutrality Could Run Through the Gulf

The Gulf states hold a unique position among Kazakhstan's international partners, as demonstrated by Kazakhstan's involvement in the 2023 Central Asia-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Summit. Addressing the summit in Jeddah, Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev highlighted the potential for synergy between Central Asia’s resources and the Gulf states’ economic innovation. He emphasised the vast opportunities in this relationship and their collective capacity to elevate their multifaceted partnership.

At the summit, discussions centred around expanding energy collaboration, with a focus on advancements in green energy and the modernisation of power generation infrastructure. President Tokayev reaffirmed Kazakhstan's willingness to engage in close partnerships with Persian Gulf energy companies.

Decarbonisation policy is an emerging development priority for Kazakhstan, reflecting global trends in sustainability and climate action. The transition to a low-carbon economy presents a significant challenge, requiring comprehensive measures for the technological modernisation of the national economy, especially in the extractive industries.

At the Climate Ambition Summit in December 2020, Kazakhstan announced its goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. This commitment was formalised in February 2023 with the adoption of the Strategy for Achieving Carbon Neutrality by 2060.The strategy seeks to balance carbon dioxide emissions with removals from the atmosphere, with an interim target to decrease greenhouse gas emissions by 15 percent by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. This reduction could be increased to 25 percent, provided international assistance is secured for the decarbonisation efforts. 

Transitioning to a decarbonised future requires a fundamental shift away from Kazakhstan’s coal-dependent energy system. The strategy estimates a total investment of $610 billion, with over half of this funding reallocated from conventional industries to more sustainable sectors. The remaining portion will be sourced from newly established investment channels.

Prominent financial organisations, including the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), remain committed to backing decarbonisation projects. Simultaneously, Kazakhstan is actively enacting reforms to encourage private sector investment in renewable energy sources.

Recognising the financial and technological commitments needed for decarbonisation, Kazakhstan is diligently fostering international partnerships. This approach is yielding support from key partners such as the EU, China, the World Bank, and the EBRD, thereby attracting further investment and the adoption of cutting-edge technologies. But additional sources of climate financing are needed—the Gulf is stepping up its commitments.

In December 2023, the sixth session of the Kazakh-Saudi intergovernmental commission convened in Riyadh to explore new opportunities for collaboration. During the meeting, ACWA Power, a Saudi company, announced plans to invest approximately $10 billion in Kazakhstan's green energy sector. This investment would support the growth of wind and hydrogen energy, thereby aiding Kazakhstan's broader decarbonisation efforts.

In March 2024, Kazakhstan and Saudi Arabia formalised this partnership for the ACWA Power project through an intergovernmental agreement, outlining their commitment to build wind power plants with a combined capacity of 1 GW, equipped with an integrated energy storage system. The project's initial investment is expected to exceed $1.8 billion. Additionally, both nations have partnered to establish a shared innovation hub in Riyadh, designed to promote Kazakhstan's IT solutions and burgeoning startups in the Middle Eastern market.

Kazakhstan is also working on its collaborations with the UAE on solar and wind initiatives. A significant milestone in this partnership was the signing of an investment deal with Masdar in 2022, aimed at building a 1 GW wind farm in the Zhambyl region. This project incorporates advanced energy storage solutions, enhancing the reliability and stability of Kazakhstan's power grid while increasing the share of renewables in the nation's energy mix and reducing carbon emissions.

Kazakhstan's regional prominence stems from its position as Central Asia’s largest economy and a leading hydrocarbon exporter, attracting roughly 60 percent of FDI inflows into Central Asia. Recognising its responsibility to curb greenhouse gas emissions, the country has pioneered the region’s first carbon trading system, creating economic incentives for businesses to decrease their emissions.

With an estimated renewable energy capacity of 1 trillion kilowatt-hours, Kazakhstan also shares its expertise with neighbouring countries, contributing to broader regional environmental improvements.

Kazakhstan is also strengthening green cooperation with Central Asian neighbors through initiatives like the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea, which addresses environmental degradation, and the Central Asian Regional Environmental Center, which supports cross-border water and biodiversity projects. In 2024, The Presidents of Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan signed a strategic agreement on the intersystem integration of the energy systems of the three countries. Collaborative efforts are also emerging through the Central Asian Regional Environmental Center (CAREC), facilitating cross-border projects focused on water resource management and safeguarding biodiversity.

Concurrently, Gulf countries are also deepening green partnerships in the region. Masdar of the United Arab Emirates is leading major projects in Uzbekistan, including the 100-megawatt Nur Navoi solar power plant. Masdar has also signed an agreement with the Kyrgyz Republic’s Ministry of Energy to develop a pipeline of renewable projects in the Central Asian nation, with a capacity of up to 1 gigawatt, starting with a 200-megawatt solar photovoltaic plant. Tajikistan is partnering with the Abu Dhabi Development Fund and is being considered as a potential investor in the Rogun project. These collaborations drive regional energy transformation and deepen links between Central Asia and the Gulf through sustainable development and shared climate objectives.

In correspondence with the shift towards climate action worldwide, Kazakhstan is not only aligning with global sustainability trends but is also crafting its own unique model for a green economy, setting a precedent for the entire region. Through a combination of national strategies and active regional partnerships, Kazakhstan is positioning itself as a hub for clean energy innovation and sustainable development in Central Asia.

Photo: Eni

As Corporate America Makes Green Retreat, GCC Firms Should Hold the Line

Corporate America is undergoing a “great green retreat,” undermining the momentum that climate finance has built in recent years. Concurrently, President Donald Trump’s administration had dealt a final blow to America’s global climate finance ambitions. The dismantling of public US entities, such as USAID—which collaborates with private American firms on global climate initiatives—has further dampened private sector interest in the field. As a result, several American multinational enterprises have begun deprioritising their climate goals, including scaling back on ESG commitments and other climate-related initiatives. 

In contrast, climate finance has been gaining traction in the Gulf region, with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, and Qatar emerging as regional leaders. They have been investing in climate finance not just domestically but also internationally, particularly in the Global South. Consequently, US firms have been among the main drivers and partners in GCC climate initiatives until now.

The GCC states have long maintained longstanding relationships with American entities, including in areas such as renewable energy and climate-smart agriculture—an approach that boosts agriculture while considering climate adaptation and mitigation. US-GCC collaboration in the climate sphere is consistently developing, with the US being recognised as a key supporter. This partnership has not only helped GCC states meet their climate goals but has also opened markets for US-based firms. However, shifts in US policy will potentially offset the GCC’s plans and ambitions in the field.

Additionally, GCC countries have issued various green bonds, which are essentially fixed-income financial instruments that raise funds for climate-beneficial projects. The green bond market has experienced a recent boom, increasing from $600 million in 2021 to $8.5 billion in 2022. This surge highlights the sudden rise in interest and demand for sustainable finance in the Gulf.

With the US retreat, there will be a gap in climate financing which will need to be filled, ideally by those countries whose interests are most threatened by this prospect. In this context, the GCC states should prioritise diversifying their climate finance partnerships, especially in emerging markets, to expand their presence, and influence in the global climate finance landscape. The GCC countries, particularly the Gulf 3—UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar—must also look inward, focusing on their own climate finance policies, and implementing new approaches to attract private ESG investors. By doing this, they should ultimately make the climate finance atmosphere in the region more resilient and impactful in the long-term. 

In recent years, GCC countries have demonstrated their strength in fostering partnerships with countries around the world across various sectors. Now, as one partner retreats, another steps forward. Other global powers may see the American withdrawal as an opportunity to capitalise on and establish themselves as more prominent leaders in the industry. For instance, China, which is not far behind the US in terms of climate finance, has already been actively forming partnerships with GCC countries in this space.

Examples include ACWA Power’s collaboration with Chinese manufacturers to supply wind turbines for the Bash and Dzhankeldy projects in Uzbekistan. Additionally, UAE-based Mensha Ventures has partnered with Chinese companies to invest $1 billion in clean technologies in Asia. This trend indicates the growing opportunities for cooperation between the GCC and China in the realm of upcoming climate finance plans.

At the same time, the GCC is also expanding its partnerships with the European Union. While the EU is also very focused on climate initiatives, it has been more limited compared to the US. Despite the EU’s ongoing collaborations with the GCC, the depth of their relationships are not equal. With climate change being less politicised in the EU than in the US, increased EU-GCC partnerships could provide more stable and reliable avenues of investment and growth. 

In November 2024, during the first EU-GCC Summit in Brussels, there were calls from leaders on both sides for stronger collaboration in climate finance and investments, identifying many potential areas for knowledge sharing and collaboration. GCC countries stand to benefit from the expertise of institutions such as the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development in financing renewable energy projects. Furthermore, the EU is well-positioned in carbon market cooperation, as a global leader in this field, to pave the way for the GCC who is also interested in mobilising funds for climate finance in emerging economies.

Presently, the GCC has invested in climate finance initiatives and projects globally, from Bangladesh to Central Asia, from North to Sub-Saharan Africa, and beyond. However, it could be argued that the GCC could better leverage its platform for economic integration to better support climate finance. For instance, Saudi Arabia has invested over $25.6 billion in Sub-Saharan Africa alone over the past decade, building a strong foundation to incentivise expansion in climate finance in the region. Additionally, the UAE has invested over $3 billion in India during the 2023-2024 fiscal year, making it the largest Middle Eastern investor in South Asia. GCC investments in Asia also extend to ASEAN countries, with $13.4 billion invested between 2016 and 2021, and recent discussions on an ASEAN-GCC trade agreement further cementing GCC investment in the region. 

Although these investments may not explicitly fall within the realm of climate finance, they can serve as a stepping stone. If ongoing GCC economic investments and partnerships are redirected toward climate-related initiatives, they could make impactful contributions to the industry. Economic cooperation through strategic partnerships and financial mechanisms can mobilise great resources for climate action. For the GCC, this foundation is already in place, as discussions have consistently highlighted that financial policies aligned with climate goals can foster sustainable economic growth alongside climate resilience. To address the gap left by the United States, GCC states must align their collaborations across the Global South with clear climate objectives. 

GCC climate investments across the Global South create a win-win situation for both parties. They present an opportunity for GCC countries to support their economic diversification efforts as climate related projects in emerging markets can result in monetary gains, such as through investments in renewable energy and the energy transition. These investments can also help GCC states fulfil their own climate goals, such as their investment in Africa’s agricultural sector, which supports the GCC’s own climate resilience and food security objectives. 

In tandem to external action, GCC countries must leverage to their domestic resources to compensate for the loss of American green investments and foster regional climate finance initiatives. Across the Gulf, there is a need for more private green investments. While sovereign wealth funds have been successful in attracting investment for climate finance and accelerating climate action, reliance on a primarily state-driven approach acts as a limitation. Integrating private investment in the field attracts capital with proven cash flow potential and innovations, resulting in a synergistic approach that leverages the strengths of both private and public sectors to contribute to the field. 

A key way for governments to attract more green private investment is by establishing clear regulations. This clarity, in turn, increases investor confidence and attracts further investment. Although various ESG frameworks have been implemented, issues such as regulatory uncertainty persist. Organisations in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar lack harmonised, standardised reporting frameworks, which has hindered the attraction of more private green investment. For the GCC, this means that the development of a GCC-wide framework focused on climate finance, incorporating a unified and comprehensive set of guidelines, standards, and best practices would be paramount. 

For GCC climate finance, the US withdrawal can be seen as a setback due to America’s prominent influence in the field. However, both inward and outward strategies present an opportunity for the GCC to capitalise on this moment. GCC states must create more accommodating conditions for climate related initiatives, and leverage their economic and political influence in the Global South to expand their climate finance reach. Such measures in the industry present a critical opportunity for the GCC states—the actions they take now will determine their future standing in global climate finance.

Photo: ACWA Power

Uzbekistan's Energy Transition Depends on Systematic Reforms

In the realm of global and energy security, 2024 was a year of unprecedented uncertainty. With issues ranging from ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, tensions around Taiwan, and escalating populism and nationalism in the US and Europe, there were heightened concerns over energy security and the control of supply chains. US President Donald Trump’s first month in office has further fuelled the sense of an impending crisis, particularly with regards to his rhetoric around the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, the adoption of tariffs, and the abandonment of green policy.

Any discussion of energy transition trends must therefore be visualised in the form of a triangle, ensuring that the competing and often contradictory goals of energy security, minimising climate impact, and ensuring energy affordability are in tension. Each country, sector, and policy crystallise a set of trade-offs between different points on this triangle.

To achieve net zero by 2050, unprecedented changes in industrial structures and infrastructure are needed. The transmission and storage systems required to support a greater and faster reliance on renewable power generation may not yet exist. While energy efficiency is acceptable politically, it is a complex challenge that requires action in disparate area—not least in consumer behaviour.

Whilst the government of Uzbekistan has adopted ambitious plans to double GDP by 2030, it has underlined its aim to achieve this sustainably, scaling up its commitments to mitigate climate change and reduce the emissions intensity of GDP. In its Nationally Determined Contribution to 2030, Uzbekistan aims to generate at least 40 percent of its electricity from renewable sources and cut greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent per unit GDP from 2010 levels. The challenge of reforming the energy sector and achieving such goals is inflated, however, by the predominance of outdated infrastructure, the continuation of unsustainable subsidies, and significant fluctuations in energy demand.

It should be noted that the decision as to when to promote what energy source is not binary; the process involves numerous trade-offs and, on occasion, political messaging, in order to achieve energy security. On a practical level, however, these resources cannot be deployed in an expedient and uniform manner that substitutes fossil fuels. In an inflationary cycle combined with facing the prospect of a global recession, the price of energy remains as important as energy security and climate change mitigation. An affordable energy transition is taking precedence and governments are opting towards the natural inclination of regulating prices and softening the price impacts for customers.

Yet with fluctuations in energy demand significant, the ability of a power system to cope with peak demand is crucial. The introduction of pricing that corresponds with demand is an unavoidable element in attracting investment in energy capacity. Power shortages have also triggered sectoral reforms and tariff increases. Electricity tariffs for businesses were increased in October 2023, and tariffs for households increased in May 2024, allowing the government to partially cut subsidies, as well as their plans to establish a unified platform for electricity trading by the end of 2024 and a liberalized wholesale power market by 2026.

That being said, Uzbekistan is making progress toward diversifying its power generation with the use of renewable sources. For example, in terms  of the economy, over 80 percent of total energy use is still generated by gas; as far as power generation goes, its genesis remains equally dominant.

Although significant attention has been given to Saudi Arabia’s ACWA Power securing agreements to invest $15 billion in expanding power generation capacity, and the United Arab Emirates’ Masdar sponsoring both conventional and renewable power plants, Uzbekistan’s reliance on Russian gas continues to grow. Following a dramatic decline in domestic gas production, Uzbekistan started importing Russian natural gas in October 2023, annual gas imports of 2.8 billion cubic metres (bcm) agreed for a period of two years, with a potential increase up to 10bcm per year by 2030. 

The economy’s heavy reliance on natural gas is a risk to the country’s decarbonisation, with gas consumption having to decline by 40 percent in order to achieve net zero in 2060. By minimising reliance on gas imports and pursuing the decarbonization of its economy, Uzbekistan can strengthen its energy security. Uzbekistan’s decarbonization efforts depend on strengthening cross-border energy flows, particularly through enhanced power transmission and a more flexible regional electricity trade. By optimising the use of regional energy resources, Uzbekistan can not only prevent power shortages but also contribute to greater regional stability and security.

It has been estimated that over $200 billion of investment is needed in the Uzbek energy system to achieve net zero by 2060. Given the scale of resources required and limitations within government finances, the private sector must be the primary investor for the green transition. In turn, accelerating the development of the country’s private sector is critical to absorb the costs and take advantage of the opportunities of the transition. The focus on decarbonisation and adaptation to climate change functions as a catalyst for the continuation of economic reforms and further support for investment.

The government has repeatedly expressed its intentions to create a better environment for private investment, using public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the energy and infrastructure sectors. Private capital can be secured to fund projects through the active participation of other stakeholders, including the use of blended finance. The strategic use of public money and development finance reduces the risk for private capital by allocating certain risks to governments or development financial institutions (DFIs). DFIs can play other roles beyond direct funding to incentivise the flow of private capital. They do this by developing new products and mechanisms that extend beyond political risk insurance to cover technology. Moreover, they ramp up risk for new technology, trade and foreign exchange risks, such as insurance products or co-lending mechanisms with the private sector through which a DFI provides subordinated debt.

What is necessary in the context of energy transition, however, goes beyond a project-by-project approach. Instead, a systematic approach and large-scale commitments by governments are required to encourage the development of a stable pipeline of investible and bankable projects, rather than a series of one-off projects in an uncertain regulatory environment. Global experience demonstrates that the key to attracting private capital for energy transition projects is assuring potential investors that political leadership remains committed to net-zero targets and will not change course. It also requires creating strong market demand through policies and regulations that encourage growth and establishing a competitive, stable tax regime that incentivises investment.

In Uzbekistan, structural reforms are needed to encourage foreign direct investment as a capital flow. The government must implement a comprehensive package of reforms, including strengthening market competition, eliminating preferential treatment, increasing energy prices, and removing subsidies. Stronger financial regulations should be adopted, and trade should be facilitated through measures such as accession to the World Trade Organisation. Additionally, climate concerns must be at the core of public investment decisions.

On this foundation, local demand and market signals can be created through incentive programs. These may include standards and tradable certificates, tax credits, and feed-in tariffs or contracts for different structures. As is already the case in Uzbekistan, PPPs can also play a role, with governments supporting market development by acting as quasi-private offtakers or by creating markets for ancillary services.

Crucially, only by reforming state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and subsequently providing attractive investment opportunities can an accelerated privatization process and a decarbonised economy be achieved. Whilst the government has recognised the need to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions for effective policy adoption, several challenges remain. There is a need for greater transparency and information on the activities and impact of SOEs, which are the largest carbon emitters. Additionally, an inventory of fossil fuel subsidies must be created to establish energy pricing, reduce subsidies, and introduce price incentives.

This remains a significant challenge due to ongoing concerns about the corporate governance and financial reporting of SOEs. Yet, only by addressing these issues can the government begin to implement a policy aligned with the country’s Nationally Determined Contribution and develop a realistic roadmap for the green transition. It will also enable better project prioritisation for climate change mitigation.

The Uzbek government must gain credibility through the implementation of consistent medium-term fiscal policies and by providing the predictability that is a prerequisite for medium-term economic growth. Indeed, the quality of government expenditure is increasingly important, with policy trade-offs required in response to the reduction of the fiscal space available. This also extends to the need to manage the inevitable tensions arising from price increases.

Not only does the unbundling of utilities require consumer prices to rise to offset the cost of their modernization, there also needs to be a demand for the green transition. Goods and services with a higher environmental impact need to be made more expensive. With regards to the social aspect of the green transition, such price increases must be well-conceived and gradual. The raising of energy prices should not lead to the impoverishment of parts of the population: a just transition should be ensured through the protection of vulnerable households.

Finally, policies need to be adopted to promote and support regional connectivity—an important catalyst for regional economic growth in the face of global uncertainty, economic fragmentation, and increased costs. Regional policy dialogue and coordination can provide a foundation for the structural reform in trade, a process realised through the harmonisation of technical regulations and standards and their revision with international green standards and practices.

The development of cross-border connections and regional power trading platforms can facilitate the expansion of renewable energy generation while improving coordination in water resource management to prevent shortages and their consequences. Given the region’s diverse energy mixes, establishing a balanced system for regional trade is essential to ensuring its energy security and economic growth.

Photo: ACWA Power

Central Asia Relies on Gulf as it Targets Energy Transition

Since gaining independence in 1991, states in Central Asia and the Caucasus have historically had the strongest energy ties with Russia and China. Yet in the past 5 years, they have significantly expanded their energy cooperation with the member states of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). This cooperation is unidirectional: Gulf companies and institutions are investing substantial capital in energy assets and infrastructure across Central Asia and the Caucasus, but not vice versa.

The GCC and Central Asia have a history of ties in the traditional energy sectors of oil and gas, but the new interregional cooperation prioritizes alternative energy sources—including solar, wind, hydropower, and hydrogen. This shift reflects a change in the GCC’s wider energy diplomacy agenda: to transition from being the world’s leading fossil energy center to being the world’s leading energy center more broadly. Recent Gulf investments in Central Asia and the Caucasus are the active edge in this effort.  

To explain why these new Gulf-Central Asia energy connections are being developed, it is necessary to understand who is involved in bringing them to life. In both regions, the energy sector is defined by blurred lines between private and government-owned companies. The result is that the distinction between private and public interests at stake in strategic energy decisions can also be blurry in both regions. Nonetheless, the new Gulf investments in Central Asia’s energy landscape are typically led by a GCC company or a GCC government, though their specific project is routinely supported by the other.  

Today, the two largest Gulf companies involved in developing new energy assets in Central Asia and the Caucasus include the UAE-based Masdar, and Saudi-based ACWA Power. Masdar, once a wholly-owned subsidiary of the UAE’s Mubadala sovereign wealth fund, is now jointly owned by Mubadala, the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC), and Abu Dhabi National Energy Company (TAQA) since December 2022. ACWA is 44 percent owned by Saudi Arabia’s PIF sovereign wealth fund, alongside a number of wealthy individuals and institutional investors. In both cases, Masdar and ACWA cannot be considered solely private or solely governmental companies. While they are inarguably driven by basic financial motives, they also remain accountable to the political elites in the UAE and Saudi Arabia, who are well represented on their boards and among their shareholders.

If Masdar and ACWA are the largest Gulf companies active in Central Asia and the Caucasus, their projects vary significantly across the region. Masdar currently has the broadest range of projects. In Uzbekistan, this includes five solar parks (ranging from 100-457 MW), two wind projects (one 500 MW project already underway, plus a new 1GW park announced at COP29), as well as plans to explore pumped hydropower. In Azerbaijan, Masdar already operates three solar parks (ranging from 230-445 MW) and one 240 MW onshore wind park. Next door in Armenia, Masdar also has a 200 MW solar park. In Kazakhstan, Masdar does not have any completed projects, but at COP29, the company signed an agreement to develop 1 GW solar park, including 600 MW of battery storage. Likewise, in Kyrgyzstan, Masdar only has a set of agreements,  including a vague promise offered in January 2023 to develop 1 GW of renewables, followed by, in December 2023, a commitment “to explore” 3.6 GW of hydropower and  renewables alongside the British EDF energy provider. Notably missing here are investments in Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, and Georgia. 

ACWA Power’s regional assets currently include a 240 MW wind park in Azerbaijan, and in Uzbekistan, four wind parks (ranging from 100-1500 MW) already completed or soon to be finished. They also have several utility-scale solar parks in Uzbekistan’s Samarkand region, which include large battery energy storage systems (BESS), and a new project underway for a 1500 MW Combined Cycle Gas-Turbine (CCGT) facility in the Sirdarya region. In each of these cases, the National Electric Grid of Uzbekistan is listed as the sole off-taker, and each facility is described on the company’s website as being a “Build, Own, Operate, Transfer” project, in which ACWA Power has claimed it ‘will take the lead in the construction, engineering, operation and maintenance the plant.’ What, when, or how the “transfer” phase will take shape remains unclear, however.

The COP29 United Nations climate talks in Azerbaijan in November 2024 saw a wide range of new energy cooperation agreements between the regions, with Saudi Arabia showing the most ambitious outlook to the developing energy landscape of Central Asia and the Caucasus. At COP, the Saudi Minister of Energy signed an agreement with three of the region’s presidents—Azerbaijan’s Ilham Aliyev, Kazakhstan’s Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, and Uzbekistan’s Shavkat Mirziyoyev—to enhance cooperation in renewable energy development and transmission and to push forward a long-elusive goal of regional power grid interconnection. The Saudi renewable energy champion ACWA was also involved in these agreements, being named as the company responsible for the renewable energy projects in the three countries. 

At COP29, the Saudi Electricity Co. also signed an MoU to develop regional interconnection projects with its counterparts in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan. COP29 also yielded a new bilateral energy “roadmap” between Saudi Arabia and Azerbaijan, but the larger 4-country agreements that Saudi officials take interest in include extending their bilateral energy diplomacy to regional energy diplomacy. This symbolizes a move beyond the more limited series of bilateral energy agreements they have been signing with the other state’s leaders since 2022.

Another notable development at COP29 was the joint agreement between Masdar, ACWA, and SOCAR Green—a branch of the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan established to implement “renewable energy projects, green hydrogen production, [and] carbon capture, utilization, and storage.” This three-country initiative is focused on exploring a 3.5 GW offshore wind project within Azerbaijan’s Caspian domain, as well as a green hydrogen and water desalination plant. The new energy projects discussed in the MoU are not surprising in and of themselves, but the fact that Masdar and ACWA are working together is notable as GCC actors are often assumed to be in competition. Rather, this project may demonstrate the possibilities for cooperation between the Gulf’s two green energy pioneers– both across the GCC borders, as well as with the Central Asia and Caucasus states hosting their investments. 

By working with SOCAR Green, Masdar and ACWA are well positioned to teach Azerbaijanis about the Gulf model of “greening” oil money by funneling it into the alternative energy sector. Regardless of whether energy watchers deem this model to be good or bad, it is expanding at a rapid pace in the Gulf. As the GCC governments and companies continue to promote non-fossil energy projects abroad, including in Central Asia and the Caucasus, they are laying the groundwork for a cooperation model that puts the GCC at the center of the post-oil energy future. In this role, the Gulf’s political and business leaders aspire to do more than offer capital to undercapitalized regions; they also aim to reap the most profits possible from controlling the vast networks of technology, infrastructure, knowhow, and resources that are needed to realize the transition to alternative energy sources. 

The Gulf’s investments in Central Asia and the Caucasus thus reflect a broader energy diplomacy agenda: to leverage their role as the world’s leading fossil fuel producers in order to remain an energy epicenter, whatever the fuel system. In this respect, the GCC’s interregional cooperation with Central Asia and the Caucasus is already a success. But whether these high-level agreements and large-scale projects will yield the kinds of financial and political returns that their Gulf proponents hope for remains an open question.

Photo: Dunyo

New Climate Financing Targets Present Opportunity for the Gulf

Following two weeks of COP29 negotiations, exhibitions, and panel events, delegates representing governments around the world reached a major consensus. Most significantly, they agreed wording on a new climate financing target for developing countries, international carbon market standards, and a support programme for national adaptation plans (NAPs) for the least developed countries.

These three key victories for the climate agenda present great opportunities for the Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar—collectively referred to as the Gulf 3—to play a leading and supportive role in investing in a 1.5C-aligned and resilient future, which was the fundamental aim of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

At the 2009 Copenhagen Climate Summit (COP15), developed countries agreed to mobilise $100 billion of annual climate financing for developing countries by 2020. This target was unfortunately never met, with the deadline extended to 2025 during the Paris Agreement signifying a commitment to updating the target to increase its ambition by the end of the decade. This brings the focus to 2024’s negotiations, which culminated in this target being updated to $300 billion annually by 2035.

This target and metric are highly contested. Developing countries want to increase the target further as their financing needs are much greater than this amount. The Overseas Development Institute has estimated that the need is closer to $1.3 trillion per year by 2035, which is the new cumulative goal. Moreover, much of this financing is currently provided in the form of debt rather than grants, adding to existing debt obligations, which is especially challenging for small and developing nations.

The new agreement requires the 24 developed nations, across Europe, the United States, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand, to deliver on this target. A broader climate financing target of $1.3 trillion has also been set by 2035, and “voluntary” contributions from countries outside the original 24 are allowed to be included in this figure.

Fossil-fuel-dependent states, including the Gulf 3, have faced criticism for their role and influence over the talks, but the opportunity remains for them to contribute further, as part of this new metric for South-South financing.

Documenting and disclosing existing investment flows can build transparency and show the world that the Gulf 3 are serious about contributing to global climate finance flows. Once this reporting infrastructure is in place, the next opportunity for the Gulf 3 would be to demonstrate their leadership and commitment to South-South climate financing by increasing financial flows from the baseline to help meet the $1.3 trillion annual funding target by 2035.  Alongside the likes of China and Korea, this effort will help to further increase South-South climate financing.

According to the World Investment Report released earlier in 2024 by the UN Conference on Trade and Development, foreign direct investment outflows from the Gulf 3 totalled some $38.2 billion in 2023, down from its peak  of $58.2 billion in 2022. While a more detailed breakdown of the share of these investments that can be considered climate financing and the proportion  allocated to other developing countries is not available, this demonstrates the scale of capital available from the Gulf 3 for this opportunity.

A significant chunk of this financing came from Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, known as the Public Investment Fund (PIF), with some $620 billion in assets under management. Of the thirteen “vital and strategic" investment sectors PIF has identified for the upcoming five years, seven are crucial to climate financing going forward: food and agriculture, metals and mining, transport and logistics, automotives, real estate, construction and building, utilities and renewables.

A similar sector focus can be seen in the investment portfolios of the UAE and Qatar. The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), Mubadala Investment Company (MIC), Emirates Investment Company (EIC), and Qatar Investment Authority (QIC), which boast a combined portfolio of $1.8 trillion, are responsible for driving investments that can help to fill this global green financing gap. In particular, the Abu Dhabi Fund for Development has a designated mandate for concessional and sustainable financing to local and global emerging economies.

COP29 also led to defined rules for both Article 6.2 and 6.4 in relation to carbon markets. The International Emissions Trading Association estimates this can raise $1 trillion of additional financing for developing countries by 2050, by channelling funding into nature-positive projects, particularly in developing nations. Article 6.2 defines the framework for countries to make bilateral agreements to exchange and trade carbon credits. Article 6.4 creates a centralised international carbon market, supervised by the UN who then validates, issues, and verifies carbon credits.

The defining of Article 6.2 and 6.4 market mechanisms means that legal and regulatory frameworks now exist for the Gulf 3 to partner bilaterally and multilaterally with countries around the world to improve the supply and demand for these carbon credits, working towards a high-quality and high-price carbon credit market.

In Baku last month, Saudi Arabia’s PIF launched a carbon credit exchange called the “Regional Voluntary Carbon Market Company,” with the auctioning of 1 million tons of carbon offset credits. Last year, the UAE Carbon Alliance announced targets to buy USD450m of Africa’s carbon market initiative, with the UAE additionally considering developing its own Emission Trading System. At the same time, Qatari firm Emsurge has announced a public-private partnership to fuel its own carbon market development.

The outcomes of COP29 present a critical opportunity for the Gulf 3 to align their financial resources with global climate goals. By scaling investments through sovereign wealth funds like PIF, ADIA, and QIC, these nations can help close the global climate financing gap and drive South-South cooperation. Transparent documentation and a commitment to increasing flows will showcase their leadership in building a resilient, 1.5C-aligned future.

Photo: WAM