US Sanctions: SWIFT Network Suspends Several Iran Banks

The SWIFT banking network, the backbone for international monetary transfers, said Monday it has suspended several Iranian banks from its service, after the United States reimposed nuclear sanctions on Tehran.

"In keeping with our mission of supporting the resilience and integrity of the global financial system as a global and neutral service provider, SWIFT is suspending certain Iranian banks' access to the messaging system," it said. 

“This step, while regrettable, has been taken in the interest of the stability and integrity of the wider global financial system."

SWIFT, the Belgian-based Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, provides banks with a secure messenger network to allow international transfers.

Without its services, Iranian banks will find it more difficult to do business with any client prepared to brave US sanctions to maintain ties with Tehran.

Some US sanctions on Iranian banks and oil exports had been suspended after Iran signed a landmark 2105 deal with six world powers to curtail its nuclear ambitions.

But these came back into effect Monday after President Donald Trump pulled out of the accord and demanded that the world again turn up the economic heat on Tehran.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said waivers would be issued to allow eight countries to buy Iranian oil, but that otherwise the measures would be "relentless."

This could mean European and other banks and businesses face secondary sanctions if Washington deems them in breach of sanctions, and US officials have been pressing SWIFT to act.

The network connects 11,000 banks and financial institutions in 200 countries and territories, while priding itself on taking a neutral political stance. 

It does not hold or manage client funds, but allows the banks to transfer funds by sending messages across the network. 

Photo Credit: SWIFT

Transcript: Special Representative for Iran Brian Hook Briefs Reporters on Iran Sanctions

This transcript was published by the Office of the Spokesperson at the U.S. Department of State. The briefing took place on November 2, 2018.

MR HOOK:  I’m happy to take questions.  And you’ve heard the Secretary talk.  I just (inaudible).

QUESTION:  What are the eight countries?

MR HOOK:  Huh?

QUESTION:  What are the eight countries? 

QUESTION:  What are the eight countries? 

MR HOOK:  Monday.  Monday.

QUESTION:  Can you at least say what are the two that said that they will cut to zero since it seems the negotiations with them are over?

MR HOOK:  It’ll – it’s all going to be announced on Monday.

QUESTION:  But why do all of this today if there’s so little detail available today?

MR HOOK:  There was a lot of detail today.  There was a full briefing by both secretaries.  So --

QUESTION:  There was not a lot of detail.

MR HOOK:  The sanctions go back into effect on Monday.  This was a preview today.

QUESTION:  Can I ask, though, similar to the question Arshad asked on the – using the word jurisdiction instead of country, can we assume that a certain island that begins with “T” is the reason that you’re using jurisdiction instead of country?  Or is that --  

MR HOOK:  I think --  

QUESTION:  Taiwan.  I’ll --

QUESTION:  Could jurisdiction mean more than one government, or does it mean one government?

MR HOOK:  Is this what Secretary Mnuchin said?

QUESTION:  He said – no, Pompeo.

QUESTION:  Both, both.  Pompeo – both of them said --

QUESTION:  They used the word jurisdictions.

QUESTION:  -- jurisdiction not country, which is why – I mean, it’s a technical point, but I’m just – and I get – I can understand that you don’t want to give the names.

MR HOOK:  I don’t know all of them.  I don’t know.  

QUESTION:  But are all of the eight countries?

QUESTION:  Single governments?

QUESTION:  Countries?

MR HOOK:  Yes.

QUESTION:  Yes countries or yes governments?

MR HOOK:  They are – they are -- 

QUESTION:  If Taiwan is among them, that would be a reason to -- 

MR HOOK:  I get it.  They’re nations.  They’re nations.

QUESTION:  Okay.  So Taiwan is not.

MR HOOK:  I’m not going to say what it’s not.  I’m saying that eight nations.

QUESTION:  Can I get a clarification on the SREs?

MR HOOK:  Yeah.

QUESTION:  Yesterday you said the waiver is granted for a six-month period and then re-evaluated. 

MR HOOK:  That’s by statute.

QUESTION:  Right.  And then the Secretary said it will take them weeks longer to wind down.  Is that all-encompassing for the eight that are being granted or just --  

MR HOOK:   No, he was – there he was talking about two of the countries that will receive an SRE are going to be given a little extra time, weeks of time, to get to zero.

QUESTION:  But they – if they can still – the waiver is for six months still by statute?

MR HOOK:  But operationally it’s only relevant for the first few weeks of the – but by law, when we give an SRE, it’s for 180 days.

QUESTION:  Right.

MR HOOK:  And that’s under the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, NDAA.  And so it’s a 180-day SRE.  It doesn’t matter whether they go to – I mean, it’s – each country is different.  In two of the countries, they will be getting to zero before the expiration of the SRE.

QUESTION:  Can you talk about kind of the broader efforts on trying to get Iran to behave like a normal regime?  I mean, does that include kind of the Twitter messaging or social media messaging, or is it something more than that, more concrete about supporting opposition groups or protestors?

QUESTION:  Is it more than just Twitter messages?  Is there something – is the U.S. doing something to kind of promote protestors?

MR HOOK:  The Iranian regime has historically not come to the negotiating table absent significant economic and diplomatic pressure.  The reimposition of our sanctions are designed to do two things:  deny the regime the revenue it needs to fund violent wars abroad, and also to change the cost-benefit analysis in our favor so that Iran decides to come back to the negotiating table. 

The Ayatollah Khamenei has said that require hostility with the United States, which is the kind of thing that you expect to hear from a revolutionary regime.  We have been very clear.  Secretary Pompeo has been very clear that we have an ear open to what is possible.  We very much want to begin work on a new and better deal to replace the insufficient Iran nuclear deal that the President left in May, and our campaign of maximum economic pressure is a critical tactic to achieve that goal.

QUESTION:  But he’s also talking about restoring democracy. 

MR HOOK:  The President, the Secretary of State, the Vice President, at all levels of the administration, have stood with the Iranian people and their aspirations for a better way of life.  The Iranian people want a more representative government, a government that does not rob them blind, that supports their human rights, their economic rights, their freedom of expression, freedom of assembly.  These are all rights that the United States wants for the Iranian people.  We think they deserve a much better way of life, and Secretary Pompeo has repeatedly made remarks addressed to the Iranian people in support of their demands for reforms from this regime.

QUESTION:  How – I want to ask the question that Gardiner asked yesterday about the Khashoggi murder and the war in Yemen and how any of that is playing into this.  I mean, how can you, on the one hand, focus so much on Iran’s human rights record while not doing enough to pressure the Saudis on some of the same very issues?

MR HOOK:  We do not share interests or values with the Iranian regime.  We have asked Saudi Arabia to increase the production of oil while we take off Iranian oil from the market, and Saudi Arabia has been very helpful to ensure an adequately supplied oil market during this period where we have seen dramatic reductions in the import of Iranian crude as part of our maximum economic pressure campaign.  The Saudi Government has successfully insulated oil from broader political issues, and that has been helpful in the broader context of our pressure campaign.

QUESTION:  Well, just to be devil’s advocate here, I understand the shared interests that you have with the Saudis on Iran.  But what shared interests, what shared values does the U.S. have with the Saudis – respect for human rights?

MR HOOK:  I can only speak to how the Saudis have helped our Iran strategy.  The President gave a speech in Riyadh on his first trip overseas as president, where he called upon our Sunni Arab partners to increase their capabilities to reverse Iranian hegemony so that our Arab partners can shoulder more of the burden in the Middle East.  And we have enjoyed a great deal of cooperation from Gulf countries and beyond to isolate Iran and to apply as much economic pressure as possible so that they don’t have the money they need to destabilize the Middle East.

QUESTION:  How is this escrow account that he talked about going to work, and how do you make sure that the Iranians are going to get basic needs fulfilled – medicine, food?

MR HOOK:  The escrow accounts that are being created for those nations that need to continue importing Iranian oil deny Iran hard currency, and it denies Iran any revenue from oil sales.  Any time Iran sells oil, that money goes into an escrow account in the importing nation’s bank, and Iran has to spend down that credit.  We strongly encourage those nations to ensure that Iran spends that money on humanitarian purchases to benefit the Iranian people.  The longest-suffering victims of the Iranian regime are the Iranian people.  This regime uses fake companies disguised as humanitarian organizations to divert purchases that should go to food, medicine, and medical devices, and they use that to enrich the regime and support revolutionary activities overseas.

QUESTION:  So you’re counting on countries like China to make sure that they don’t use money for those things?

MR HOOK:  The United States will be monitoring these escrow accounts very closely.  Unlike in prior administrations, we will ensure that the money is not spent on illicit activities, that there isn’t any leakage in these escrow accounts, and we will work closely with countries to encourage the purchase and – the sale and purchase of humanitarian goods to benefit the Iranian people.  Our sanctions regime has very clear exceptions for the sale of food, medicine, and medical devices.

QUESTION:  So how does the travel ban fit into the U.S. support for Iranian people?

MR HOOK:  Because the Iranian regime is the largest sponsor of terrorism in the world, we have a restrictive visa policy.  And that policy is driven by the terrorism of the regime.  It is not driven by a desire to restrict the average Iranian people.  The problem we have is --

QUESTION:  But it does.

MR HOOK:  But that is the problem of the regime.  If the regime would stop funding terrorism and open up its economy so that we can see where the money goes, it would create a much better environment for us to be granting visas.

QUESTION:  So for the countries that you say need to keep importing oil, do you foresee issuing these exemptions over and over again?  Are you going to put an upper limit on how many times they’ll be renewed?

MR HOOK:  Our goal remains getting countries to zero imports of Iranian oil.  In 2019, our projections are that oil supply will exceed demand, and that creates a much better atmosphere for us to bring remaining nations to zero as quickly as possible.

QUESTION:  So you’re not putting an upper limit on how – for how – how many times these exemptions will be renewed at this point?

MR HOOK:  We are not looking to grant additional SREs at the end of the 180-day period.  We are being very careful to advance our maximum economic pressure campaign without increasing the price of oil.  Next year we anticipate a stronger oil supply coming online, and that will allow us to accelerate the path to zero.

QUESTION:  And are you – how many Iranian banks will be cut off from SWIFT?  I mean, the administration is saying more than prior, but can you give a number?

MR HOOK:  That will be announced by Secretary Mnuchin on Monday.

QUESTION:  He did say, though, on this subject – he was very precise in his language.  He said “certain designated Iranian financial institutions.”  That does not categorically mean all.  So is it possible that either, one, don’t redesignate all of the banks that had previously been designated; and two, is it possible that some designated bank, because he used the word “certain designated,” would not be required to disconnect?

MR HOOK:  I’m not going to interpret what “certain” means beyond saying that he will announce all the banks on Monday.

QUESTION:  The 20 – 20 countries import 80 percent of Iran’s oil, as I understood – stand.  Are those eight countries, any of them, among those 20 – the eight countries receiving the SREs?

MR HOOK:  That there’s a small group of – that there’s a – there is a relatively small number of countries that make up the lion’s share of the import of Iranian crude.

QUESTION:  And are any of them getting exemptions?

MR HOOK:  I’m not going to get ahead of the Secretary’s announcement on Monday.

QUESTION:  Can you offer a little clarity on the response about non-U.S. civil nuclear cooperation?  Will waivers be granted in that --

MR HOOK:  The Secretary addressed that this morning, and it’ll be announced on Monday.

QUESTION:  On the humanitarian transaction, Europeans have expressed concern in the past weeks that even though there were exemptions to humanitarian goods and services, the financials mechanism were not safe enough, that you have to clarify what are the means by which the countries and entities can do those kind of transactions.  Do you think that what you announced today clarifies this and that it’s safe to do humanitarian transactions with Iran?

MR HOOK:  The Iranian regime has a history of creating front companies to divert the distribution of humanitarian goods.  Financial institutions around the world know of Iran’s history of deceiving banks on the sale of humanitarian goods.  The burden is on Iran to open up its dark economy so that banks around the world have more confidence that when they facilitate humanitarian transactions that the humanitarian goods will reach the Iranian people. 

The United States is the largest donor of humanitarian assistance in the world.  Every sanctions regime we have makes exceptions for food, medicine, and medical devices.  That is, we have done our part; the Iranian regime needs to do its part by making those transactions possible in an open and transparent financial system.

QUESTION:  Sounds like there’s not very many safe ways of trade – like, for pharmaceutical companies and medical companies.

MR HOOK:  The Iranian regime makes it very difficult to facilitate the sale of humanitarian goods and services.

QUESTION:  The Europeans says that the fear is that even if you sell humanitarian goods to Iran, you will be target by U.S. sanctions, so they addressing this to you and not to Iran.

MR HOOK:  Say that again?

QUESTION:  The European countries say that companies fear that if they sell those goods to Iran, they will be targeted by U.S. sanctions.  So they ask you to say what are the safe channels to do that.

MR HOOK:  The burden is not on the United States to identify the safe channels.  The burden is on the Iranian regime to create a financial system that complies with international banking standards to facilitate the sale and provision of humanitarian goods and assistance.

QUESTION:  Right, but I think that the point is that they are looking for some kind of, like, assurance --

QUESTION:  Guidance from OFAC.

QUESTION:  Guidance.

MR HOOK:  We have been – OFAC has given very clear guidance over many years --

QUESTION:  That’s not what the Europeans say.

MR HOOK:  We have done our part to permit the sale of humanitarian goods to Iran.  That is our part.  That is our role.  Iran has a role to make these transactions possible.  Banks do not have confidence in Iran’s banking system – often don’t have confidence in Iran’s banking system to facilitate those transactions.  That’s Iran’s problem; it is not our problem.

QUESTION:  But banks do not have confidence, the companies do not have confidence in Iran banks because they are subject to American sanctions from now on.

MR HOOK:  That’s not true.

QUESTION:  That’s what the Europeans say.  I’m just --

MR HOOK:  I’m giving you the answer. 

QUESTION:  We were expecting the list.  (Laughter.)

MR HOOK:  But he told you it was coming Monday.

QUESTION:  Why is it that – and when you say Monday, this isn’t going to be at literally 12:01 Monday morning, is it?  Or I mean --

MR HOOK:  No.  The Secretary will announce it on Monday, and then it will be published in the Federal Register.

QUESTION:  Okay, but he’ll announce it – what, do you have any – like, I just want it for personal planning purposes.

MODERATOR:  About 8:30 in the morning.

QUESTION:  8:30 Monday morning and not beforehand.  So in other words, I – at 12:01 Monday morning, they go into effect --

MR HOOK:  Yes.

QUESTION:  -- but there won’t be a – like, is something going to go up on the Treasury website at 12:01?  I mean, I’m just trying to figure out --

MR HOOK:  I don’t know about that.  For our part, on the SREs and anything else will be announced on Monday.  I don’t – Treasury may have a different way where at 12:01 they have to --

QUESTION:  So you guys aren’t planning on saying who the eight are at 12:01.

MR HOOK:  No.  No.  No.

QUESTION:  But presumably these eight are aware that – right, they’ve been told that they’re okay to – because they’re all coming out of the woodwork now, the Turks, the Italians, the South Koreans, the Indians, the – they are.

MR HOOK:  I think you’ve answered your own question.

QUESTION:  Well, I just want to make sure no one’s lying.

MR HOOK:  Oh.  We’ll announce it on Monday.

QUESTION:  And so will we see sanctions on the countries that aren’t getting these things on Monday?

MR HOOK:  We expect – well, we have already seen enormous pre-compliance with the reimposition of our sanctions because corporations around the world are rightly choosing to sell goods and services in the United States over the Iranian market if given the choice.

QUESTION:  But I mean, weren’t we going to see sanctions on big countries that aren’t – that don’t get these waivers?  Are you going to – sanctions announced on Monday?

MR HOOK:  We expect nations around the world to comply with sanctions because it’s in their interest, and it promotes our broader national security objectives to address a significant and expanding threat to peace and security.

Okay.

QUESTION:  Thank you.

MR HOOK:  All right, thank you.

Photo Credit: State Department

Transcript: Pompeo and Mnuchin Brief Reporters on Forthcoming Iran Sanctions

This transcript was published by the Office of the Spokesperson at the U.S. Department of State. The briefing took place on November 2, 2018.

MS NAUERT:  Thank you, sir.  Good morning, everyone, and welcome to today’s on-the-record call on the Iran snapback sanctions.  We’re pleased to have with us Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Secretary of the Treasury Steve Mnuchin.  They will each have brief remarks at the top and then take several of your questions.  We’ll start first with Secretary Pompeo. 

Secretary, please, go ahead.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Thank you, Heather.  Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the call.  Earlier this year, President Trump withdrew from the fatally flawed nuclear deal and implemented a new campaign aimed at fundamentally altering the behavior of the Islamic Republic of Iran.  This part of the campaign about which we’re speaking today is simple.  It is aimed at depriving the regime of the revenues that it uses to spread death and destruction around the world.  Our ultimate aim is to compel Iran to permanently abandon its well-documented outlaw activities and behave as a normal country.

Today, Secretary Mnuchin and I will discuss one of the many lines of effort to achieve these fundamental changes in the Iranian regime’s behavior as directed by the President.  While important, these economic sanctions are just a part of the U.S. Government’s total effort to change the behavior of the Ayatollah Khomeini, Qasem Soleimani, and the Iranian regime.

On November 5th, the United States will reimpose sanctions that were lifted as part of the nuclear deal on Iran’s energy, ship building, shipping, and banking sectors.  These sanctions hit at the core areas of Iran’s economy.  They are necessary to spur changes we seek on the part of the regime. 

In order to maximize the effect of the President’s pressure campaign, we have worked closely with other countries to cut off Iranian oil exports as much as possible.  We expect to issue some temporary allotments to eight jurisdictions, but only because they have demonstrated significant reductions in their crude oil and cooperation on many other fronts and have made important moves towards getting to zero crude oil importation. These negotiations are still ongoing.  Two of the jurisdictions will completely end imports as part of their agreements.  The other six will import at greatly reduced levels.

Let me put this in context for you.  The Obama administration issued SREs to 20 countries multiple times between 2012 and 2015.  We will have issued, if our negotiations are completed, eight and have made it clear that they are temporary.  Not only did we decide to grant many fewer exemptions, but we demanded much more serious concessions from these jurisdictions before agreeing to allow them to temporarily continue to import Iranian crude oil.  These concessions are critical to ensure that we increase our maximum pressure campaign and accelerate towards zero.

Our laser-focused approach is succeeding in keeping prices stable with a benchmark Brent price right about where it was in May of 2018 when we withdrew from the JCPOA.  Not only is this good for American consumers and the world economy, it also ensures that Iran is not able to increase its revenue from oil as its exports plummet.  We will, we expect, have reduced Iranian crude oil exports by more than 1 million barrels even before these sanctions go into effect. 

This massive reduction since May of last year is three to five times more than what many analysts were projecting when President Trump announced our withdrawal from the deal back in May.  We exceeded our expectations for one simple reason: Maximum pressure means maximum pressure.

The State Department closed the Obama era condensate loophole which allowed countries to continue importing condensate from Iran even while sanctions were in place.  This loophole allowed millions of dollars to continue to flow to the regime. 

This administration is treating condensate the same as crude since the regime makes no distinction between the two when it decides to spend its oil revenue on unlawful ballistic missiles, terrorism, cyberattacks, and other destabilizing activities like the assassination plot Denmark disclosed this past week. 

And starting today, Iran will have zero oil revenue to spend on any of these things.  Let me say that again.  Zero.  One hundred percent of the revenue that Iran receives from the sale of crude oil will be held in foreign accounts and can be used by Iran only for humanitarian trade or bilateral trade in nonsanctioned goods and services.  

These new sanctions will accelerate the highly successful effects of our sanctions that have already occurred.  The maximum pressure we imposed has caused the rial to drop dramatically, Rouhani’s cabinet is in disarray, and the Iranian people are raising their voices even louder against a corrupt and hypocritical regime.

On that note, our actions today are targeted at the regime, not the people of Iran, who have suffered grievously under this regime.  It’s why we have and will maintain many humanitarian exemptions to our sanctions including food, agriculture commodities, medicine, and medical devices. 

I will now turn the call over to Secretary Mnuchin.

SECRETARY MNUCHIN:  Thank you very much.  Since the beginning of the Trump administration, the Treasury Department has been committed to putting a stop to Iran’s destabilizing activities across the world.  We’ve engaged a massive economic pressure campaign against Iran, which remains the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism.  To date, we have issued 19 rounds of sanctions on Iran, designating 168 targets as part of our maximum pressure campaign.  We have gone after the financial networks that the Iranian regime uses to fuel its terrorist proxies and Hizballah and Hamas, to fund the Houthis in Yemen, and to support the brutal Assad regime in Syria.

The 180-day wind-down period ends at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on Sunday November 4th.  As of Monday November 5th, the final round of snapback sanctions will be enforced on Iran’s energy, shipping, shipbuilding, and financial sectors.  As part of this action on Monday, the Treasury Department will add more than 700 names to our list of blocked entities.  This includes hundreds of targets previously granted sanctions relief under the JCPOA, as well as more than 300 new designations.  This is substantially more than we ever have previously done.  Sanctions lifted under the terms of Iran’s nuclear deal will be reimposed on individuals, entities, vessels, and aircraft that touch numerous segments of Iran’s economy.  This will include Iran’s energy sector and financial sectors.  We are sending a very clear message with our maximum pressure campaign that the U.S. intends to aggressively enforce our sanctions.  Any financial institution, company, or individual who evades our sanctions risks losing access to the U.S. financial system and the ability to do business with the United States or U.S. companies.  We are intent on ensuring that global funds stop flowing to the coffers of the Iranian regime. 

I want to make a couple of comments on the SWIFT messaging systems since I’ve received lots of questions about this over the last few weeks.  So I’d like to make four points.  Number one, SWIFT is no different than any other entity.  Number two, we have advised SWIFT the Treasury will aggressively use its authorities as necessary to continue intense economic pressure on the Iranian regime, and that SWIFT would be subject to U.S. sanctions if it provides financial messaging services to certain designated Iranian financial institutions.  Number three, we have advised SWIFT that is must disconnect any Iranian financial institution that we designate as soon as technologically feasible to avoid sanctions exposure.  Number four, just as was done before, humanitarian transactions to nondesignated entities will be allowed to use the SWIFT messaging system as they have done before, but banks must be very careful that these are not disguised transactions or they could be subject to certain sanctions.  Thank you very much.

MS NAUERT:  Thank you, sirs.  Why don’t we go ahead, take our first question.  We’ll go to Matt Lee with the Associated Press.  Matt, go ahead.

QUESTION:  Thank you, Heather.  Both – either or both of you, on SWIFT, there are a lot of complaints among the President’s allies in Congress that this does not go far enough, and that without designating – without going after SWIFT harder for these messaging transactions, that it allows a serious loophole.  I understand Secretary Mnuchin’s four points on it, but how will you address this criticism?  Because it’s already coming even before this announcement today.

SECRETARY MNUCHIN:  Okay, well let me – Secretary Mnuchin – let me make some comments.  First of all, I think there’s been a lot of fueled misinformation as it relates to SWIFT and what we’re doing with SWIFT.  So that’s why I want to be very clear.  So one, okay, I think there was information that SWIFT would not be subject to sanctions.  That’s not the case.  SWIFT will be subject to sanctions.  Number two, as I said, that – could be subject to sanctions, excuse me.  Number two, it is our intent that they cut off designated entities as was done before.  And again, I think there’s misinformation that they cut off everybody last time.  Again, they did allow for certain entities to do humanitarian transactions consistent with what’s allowed under our sanctions.  There are exceptions for humanitarian sanctions, but I want to very clear, people need to be careful that those are real humanitarian – those are real humanitarian transactions.  So again, I would just say I – hopefully this will clarify the misinformation that’s out there.

MS NAUERT:  Next question, we’ll go to Nick Wadhams from Bloomberg.

QUESTION:  Hi.  I had a question about the oil sanctions going into effect.  Will those include – or will there be exceptions granted for nonhumanitarian transactions such as consumer goods, as were allowed last time, or will Iran only be allowed – or will Iran only be allowed to spend revenue that it gains through – on humanitarian items?  And then second, if you’re giving eight waivers and two jurisdictions are already cutting imports to zero, what’s the point of giving them – those two jurisdictions waivers?  Thanks.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Nick, this is Mike Pompeo.  With respect to your first point, you’ll see the details on Monday.  There are nonhumanitarian goods that we included in there, but they’re small.  They’re ones that you would’ve already seen in the exemptions that were granted under the direction of the President.  Second, some of these will take a few months to get to zero.  So by November 5th they won’t be there.  That’s the purpose of those exemptions, to give them a little bit longer to wind down.  Weeks.

MS NAUERT:  Pardon me?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Weeks longer to wind down.

MS NAUERT:  Next question, Mike Warren from the Weekly Standard.

QUESTION:  Hi, gentlemen, thank you.  I want to follow-up on Matt’s questions about SWIFT.  Secretary Mnuchin, you said that certain financial institutions in Iran will be cut off from SWIFT.  Could you explain exactly which financial institutions, or maybe the financial institutions described in a Treasury FAQ, the Central Bank of Iran and other Iranian financial institutions described in section 104(c)(2) blah blah blah – could you be more specific about which institutions?  And how can – how can the United States Government be confident in SWIFT’s ability to monitor transactions using SWIFT that they – I imagine there are numerous of these transactions going on daily.  How can the United States Government be confident that those are not transactions that are funding the bad actions that the government says is – they are trying to stop?

SECRETARY MNUCHIN:  So again, let me comment on the first issue, which – that the list of banks, which will be substantially longer than last time, will be coming out over the weekend.  And as it relates to monitoring transactions, again, financial institutions have liability for any transactions that go through SWIFT or any other mechanisms.  I’m being told the list will come out on Monday.  And again, it’s our expectation that that will be implemented as soon as technologically feasible.

MS NAUERT:  Okay, thank you.  Next question goes to Elise Labott from CNN.

QUESTION:  Thank you.  The question is for both secretaries, but maybe from a different angle.  Could you address the workaround that the Europeans are trying to institute to avoid U.S. banks, maybe using their own central banks or electronic transactions?  For Secretary Mnuchin, how much revenue do you think this would give the Iranians, and how seriously are you taking that in terms of a financial component?

And then Secretary Pompeo, could you talk about once these sanctions go into effect and if the Europeans do try to institute this workaround, what the diplomatic implications for relations with European allies?  Thank you.

SECRETARY MNUCHIN:  I’ll comment on the Special Purpose Vehicle.  I have no expectation that there will be any transactions that are significant that go through a Special Purpose Vehicle based upon what I’ve seen.  But when the details come out of some Special Purpose Vehicle, if there are sanctions – if there are transactions that go through there that have the intent of evading our sanctions, we will aggressively pursue our remedies.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  And let me take the second part of that.  We’ve been working closely with the Europeans on this set of issues.  We’re very confident that our sanctions will be incredibly effective.  And frankly, I can prove that already.  As I stated, the Iranian economy today is already feeling the effects of this.  It’s already feeling the effects of this effort not because the sanctions have snapped back – that won’t occur until – on Monday – but because the world and Iran knew this was coming.  And so European entities of any scale that are doing business with the United States of America have already ceased their conduct with Iran.  There may be an exception to that, but there has been an enormous departure of European businesses.

So whatever it may be that the EU is proposing, the folks who have risk – financial risk, business risk, operation risk – have already made their decision about the effectiveness of the sanctions that will be reimposed this coming week.

MS NAUERT:  Our next question goes to Michele Kelemen with NPR.

QUESTION:  Yeah, hi, thank you.  One quick question that – just technically, which of the eight countries are getting these waivers?  And then secondly, for Secretary Pompeo, you said in one of your interviews this week that the U.S. wants to restore democracy in Iran.  Is that one of the goals of this campaign?  And if so, how do you make sure that these sanctions aren’t going to hurt average Iranians who, as you point out, are suffering under this corrupt regime?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Yes, thanks for the question.  The President’s policy is very clear:  We are looking to change the Iranian leadership’s behavior.  I laid out the 12 things we’ve asked them to do; that is the goal not only of what we’re speaking about this morning – and please don’t lose sight, we’re talking about a set of sanctions that will be reimposed on Monday.  The administration’s efforts to change Iranian behavior are far broader, far deeper, there are many other lines of effort.  We’re simply focused on this line of effort today because of the significance of November 5th.

My comments about restoring democracy are completely consistent with what we have described before.  We’re counting on the Iranian people to have the opportunity and we are working towards allowing the Iranian people to have the opportunity to have the government they want, a government that doesn’t take wealth from their country and spend it on malign activity around the world.  I mean, this is a regime that is conducting a assassination campaign inside of Europe today, murdering not Iranian citizens in those countries, but folks who live, reside, and are citizens of those European countries.  These are the behaviors we’re trying to change, and our every effort is aimed at giving the Iranian people the opportunity to have the government that they not only want but deserve.

MS NAUERT:  Next question:  Josh Rogin, Washington Post.

QUESTION:  Thank you so much for your time.  Thanks for your service.  I’d like to ask you about the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.  My understanding is that you waived secondary sanctions on foreign firms that do business with that organization, mostly Russian and Chinese firms that are involved in the Arak and Fordow facilities.  Why did you make that decision, and why are you letting Arak and Fordow continue?  And are there plans to change that in the future?  Thank you.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Thanks, thanks for the question.  We are not allowing the continued work to develop nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons systems in Arak and Fordow.  We will provide on Monday a complete explanation of what we’re going to do with the continued efforts to prevent those facilities from doing the things that put the world at risk through proliferation, and we’ll give you all the detail.  It’s a long and complex answer, but we’re happy to provide it to you on Monday morning.

MS NAUERT:  Final question to Arshad with Reuters, please.

QUESTION:  Two things.  One, exactly how many financial institutions are going to be redesignated, i.e. put back on the SDN list on Monday?  Previously I believe the number was close to or slightly above 30.  You said it would be substantially more.  How many is it going to be?

Secondly, you pointedly said that you were granting the exceptions to eight jurisdictions.  Is one of those jurisdictions the European Union, thereby covering a much larger group of countries, i.e. 28 EU member-states?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Steven, you want to go first?

SECRETARY MNUCHIN:  I’ll answer the first part.  So the bank list will come out on Monday.  Again, it will be more than last time, and again, we may continue to add banks to that in the future.  But the original list will come out on Monday and we’ll carefully monitor situations to add on more banks as needed.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  The second part of your question, we will provide the list of the eight jurisdictions on Monday.  The EU will not be receiving an SRE.

MS NAUERT:  The final question, Carol Morello, Washington Post.

QUESTION:  Hi, thanks for doing this.  Say in the past, the Iranians have blended their oil with foreign oil to evade sanctions, and there have already been reports that they are turning off the ID tags on their tankers.  So what in particular are you going to be doing to track their attempts to evade these sanctions?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Thanks for the question.  Make no mistake about it, the Iranians will do everything they can to circumvent these sanctions – that’s unsurprising to me.  They’ll turn off ships, they’ll try and do it through private vessels, they’ll try and find third parties that don’t interact with the United States to provide insurance mechanisms.  The list of Iranian efforts to circumvent these sanctions is long.  You should all recognize there’s a reason for that.  These sanctions are far tougher than the sanctions that have ever been imposed on the Islamic Republic of Iran.  That is why they are so desperate to find ways to circumvent it. 

And I won’t speak to our efforts to counter those circumvention efforts.  There are many, they are varied, and make no mistake:  The United States is fully prepared to do all that we can to prevent Iran from circumventing not only the crude oil sanctions and the financial sanctions, but all of the designations and all of the other sanctions that are being reimposed this coming Monday and those that are already in place.

SECRETARY MNUCHIN:  And I would just add to that that anybody that does facilitate those transactions will be subject to sanctions and will be added to the list.

MS NAUERT:  Secretary Pompeo, Secretary Mnuchin, thank you so much for joining us.  Everyone, thanks for joining the call.  Have a great day.  We’ll be putting out a transcript shortly.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Thank you all. 

Photo Credit: Wikicommons

US Details New Sanctions to Hit Iran's Banks, Oil Industry

he United States will add 700 individuals and entities to its Iran blacklist and pressure the global SWIFT banking network to cut off Tehran when expanded sanctions are put in place next week, US officials said Friday.

But eight countries will be able to continue importing Iranian oil at lower levels in order to avoid upsetting global crude markets when the sanctions take effect on Monday, they said.

The US aims to cripple the Iranian economy to pressure Tehran to halt its nuclear activities and what the US says is broad support for "terrorism" in the region, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said.

The reimposition of sanctions "is aimed at depriving the regime of the revenues it uses to spread death and destruction around the world," Pompeo said.

"Our ultimate aim is to compel Iran to permanently abandon its well-documented outlaw activities and behave as a normal country."

The sanctions come six months after President Donald Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal struck between world powers and Iran.

At the time, he began reimposing sanctions that had been suspended or removed by his predecessor Barack Obama. That process will be completed starting from midnight Sunday, US eastern time, when sanctions on the regime's banks, shippers, shipbuilders and oil sector are imposed.

The impact remains in question as other countries, particularly Washington's European allies, resist joining its effort to economically strangle the Tehran regime.

The European Union has gone so far as to protect businesses that operate in Iran. It has announced plans for a legal framework through which firms can skirt US sanctions, although few major corporations have been eager to risk the wrath of penalties in the world's largest economy.

"This is not 2012 when the world was united behind sanctions against Iran. This is the Trump administration trying to force the rest of the world to go along with a policy that most countries do not accept," said Barbara Slavin, an Iran expert at the Washington-based Atlantic Council.

"The US has had some success in terms of frightening away major corporations. The sanctions hurt a lot. But Iran is still going to be able to sell oil," especially to China, she said.

Oil Trade Exemptions

Pompeo said the US will grant exemptions to eight countries that have pledged to or have already cut back on purchases of petroleum from Iran, which has long depended on crude exports to power its economy.

He did not name the eight countries, but they are believed to include India, Japan, South Korea, and possibly China.

Pompeo said the countries agreed that the payments for the oil will go into offshore accounts that Iran will only be able to tap for "humanitarian trade, or bilateral trade in non-sanctioned goods and services."

"Maximum pressure means maximum pressure," Pompeo said.

To punish Iranian banks, US Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin said the global financial network SWIFT—which enables secure bank-to-bank communications and transactions -- will also be subject to US sanctions if it provides services to Iranian financial institutions on the US blacklist, which includes most major Iranian banks.

That could make it very hard for Iran to do business with other countries.

"SWIFT is no different than any other entity," Mnuchin said.

US Objective in Question

Justifying the action, Pompeo has issued a list of demands for Iran that go well beyond the nuclear program that was the focus of Obama's deal.

He wants the Shiite clerical regime to withdraw from war-ravaged Syria, where it is a critical ally of President Bashar al-Assad, and to end longstanding support to regional militant movements Hezbollah and Hamas.

The US also wants Iran to stop backing Yemen's Huthi rebels, who are facing a US-supported air campaign led by Saudi Arabia.

But experts don't expect Iran's leaders to immediately throw in the towel.

"It's basically magical thinking. The Iranians have been able to continue their support to regional proxies and allies for 40 years despite economic pressure," said Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group.

He said the Trump administration believed that a constrained, struggling Iran would see its influence erode. But the final goal, he said, was unclear.

"I think the end-game depends on who you're asking. The president himself is interested in having a broader, better deal with the Iranians, but I believe that most of his national security team are interested in either destabilizing Iran or assuring a regime change in Tehran," Vaez said.

Photo Credit: State.gov